Monday 11 September 2023

THE PALACES OF BUNDI

 GLORIOUS INDIAN PALACES OF THE PAST: BUNDI

Jeypore Palace may be called the Versailles of India; Udaipur's House of State is dwarfed by the hills round it and the spread of the Pichola Lake; Jodhpur's House of strife, gray towers on red rock, is the work of giants, but the Palace of Bundi, even in broad daylight, is such a palace as men build for themselves in uneasy dreams-- the work of goblins rather than of men.    Rudyard Kipling, 1887

  The Bundi Palace with Taragarh Fort Walls Visible at the Topmost Portion.

Bundi is a city and a municipality of approximately 95,000 inhabitants in the Hadoti region of Rajasthan state in northwest India. It is of particular architectural note for its ornate forts, palaces, and stepwell reservoirs known as baoris. It is the administrative headquarters of Bundi District. Bundi is situated about 35 km from Kota and 210 km from Jaipur.

Bundi Palace: General description or information about Bundi Palace is rather limited or just duplicated in most websites detailing Bundi today. Bundi (Garh) Palace takes pride of place amongst the Forts and Palaces in Bundi, situated on the side of the hill below but adjacent to the Taragarh Fort. The palace is accessed from the bazaar (north - western end). Originally thought to be built during the 16th and 17th centuries, using stone from local quarries, this outstanding palace represents classic Rajasthani architecture, liberally sprinkled with delicately carved brackets, pillars, balconies and sculpted elephants, crowned by breathtakingly bedazzling friezes. However, its construction is now dated to 1598 CE. Moreover, confusion between the Hindu calendar and the Gregorian has led to overlapping periods of reign of various rulers. Rulers were permitted by the Mughals to call themselves Rao, then Rao Raja and finally, by the British, Rao Maharajas. The monuments are closed to the public.

A closer look at the Palaces

The Royal Lineage: The list of rulers relevant to this chronicle is given below.

Ø  Rao Bhoj Singh ( 1585- 1607)

Ø  Rao Rattan Singh (1607-31)

Ø  Rao Chhattar Sal (1632-58)

Ø  Rao Bhao Singh (1658-78) the eldest son of Chhattar Sal

Ø  Rao Anirudh Singh (1682 - 1696) grandnephew of Bhao Singh

Ø  Rao Budh Singh (1696 to 1735)

Ø  Rao Ummed Singh (1749-1770). A period of 14 years remain unaccounted for.

Ø  Rao Raja Bishan Singh (1773-1821)

Ø  Maharao Raja Ram Singh (1821-89)

Ø  Rao Raja Raghubir Singh (1889-1927)

The Core of Bundi Palace:

Rao Bhoj Singh’s audience hall, the Hathiyansal, facing Chattar Mahal (Rao Chhattar Sal’s creation) is the earliest of the major buildings remaining within Bundi Palace. Built by Rao Bhoj Singh (1585-1607), this remainder of Rao Bhoj Singh’s palace is dated S.1655 (1598 CE). Bhoj was the father of Rao Ratan Singh, who built his own audience hall, the Ratan Daulat, on a larger and different building concept, with unique style, sense of space, quality of work, and physical orientation. Ratan Singh’s palace, Ratan Mahal, is behind Ratan Daulat. The inference is obvious: The palaces of these three key rulers of Bundi are closely interrelated, physically as well as dynastically; they form the historic core of Bundi Palace, the core from which later buildings extended.

Stepping Back Into History

The Palace of Raj Bhoj: The Hathiyansal, The Phul Mahal, and The Badal Mahal:

When the palace was in use, Hathipol would have been very active. All arrivals and departures took place here, as you could access public/private quarters, including, via secreted passages, the zenana. A stepway on the right led to a raised gallery and into the Ratan Daulat, the audience hall built by Rao Ratan Singh (1607-1631). This was a high and open hall overlooking the western entrance. At the opposite end, another passage led into a raised courtyard looking down on the Hathipol. The spaces of Bhoj Singh’s palace are small, common to all early Rajput structures. The audience hall of Bhoj Singh is named Hathiyansal for the fine sculptures of elephants (hathiyan) atop its pillars. Immediately above is a set of rooms called the Phul Mahal, with exceptional architecture and nineteenth-century paintings. The upper floor had a partly covered terrace and a jharokha, a window (now closed in) for the people of Bundi to get a glimpse of their Rao.  There is also a single painted room, about 4.2 x 7.5 metres, known as the Badal Mahal (“Cloud Palace”) because of the decorations on its ceiling. Here we sight something very different from anything seen so far and most memorable. The Badal Mahal paintings, composed and completed over decades, are the finest wall-paintings in Rajasthan and fashion one of the greatest painted spaces in India.

The Palace Explored Further:

Ummed Singh contributed the most to the beautification of various halls, staterooms, other rooms and galleries. Kishen Singh, nephew of the issueless Rao Bhao Singh, was given the territory of Gugaur to govern. His son, Anirudh Singh, was adopted by Rao Bhao Singh and ascended the throne in 1682 CE. Traditionally, Rajasthani palaces were compacted from the private spaces of predecessors, as each ruler added new and more extensive quarters to reflect his accession. Palaces were therefore always under construction or renovation. This definite compaction is clearly visible in the photograph above. None of their abodes are open to the public, though an appendage, the exquisitely painted Chitra Shala, a gallery in another Mahal called Sheesh Mahal, is open all week between 9am-5pm. This Chitra Shala, also known as   Ummed Mahal, replete with miniature Rajasthani paintings, was built on the express orders of Ummed Singh, dating it to his reign in the 18th century.

The renowned Bundi murals may be seen by a privileged few at Chattar Mahal and Badal Mahal, both part of the vast palace complex. Chattar Mahal can be accessed by only one passage, a steep, cobbled ramp. Entry to the palace is through the Hazari Pol or Gate of the Thousand, leading into a small courtyard and the Naubat Khana or the Refreshment Room, then the Hathi Pol (Elephant Gate) with its two prominent elephants and old water clock, the Ratan Daulat which was the main audience hall built by Rao Ratan Singh (1607-1631), and the Diwan-e- Aam (Hall of Public Audience), where there is a marble throne. The famous murals are located on the upper floors, the parts of the palace that are closed to the public. Flash photography is not permitted. Kipling had unfettered access when he visited Bundi In 1887 and his observations may be used to visualise Bundi Palace as it existed in its heyday.

The palace is wedged into and out of the hillside, in enormous terrace on terrace, and dominates the whole of the city. Since there has been little change in the Palace or the city since then, Kipling’s notes provide a perspective when going through the palace today. Access to the abode of the Rajas is through “Hathipol” ( Elephant Gate ) to a courtyard, a stable for the King’s favourite horses, with their grooms. 

Aniruddha Mahal and Rang Vilas:

You have to go through the complex structure at Bundi with a guide officially cleared to unlock the many closed areas. You meander around to see what lies behind the locked doors. Kipling found private quarters, treasuries, courtyards, audience halls and a verdant garden which had a tank for goldfish. This garden is today a garden in name only.

The large Aniruddha Mahal, an end-17th century construction is to its west. For want of a source of information, we need to rely on the omnipresent Kipling. You have to step up to Rang Vilas from Aniruddha Mahal. Rang Vilas has a small and open interior courtyard facing the garden, with three sides under covered verandahs. Five inner rooms open onto the courtyard. These are a room with wall paintings, once a bedroom; a Shish Mahal (a room with mirror work); a store room (with images of Saraswati, Gaj Laxmi, and Ganesh over its entrance); a toilet (entrance marked by images of Shiv and Nandi, Durga on a tiger and Ganesh) ; and the Poojaghar (prayer room) of Rao Raja Ummed Singh (1749 to 1770), marked by inlaid ivory doors. At one corner of the garden is a Hamam, or Turkish bath.

The Rang Vilas has historical pictures and painting on its panels, with frescoes in black, white and red, of elephants engaged in combat running along the floor. The Rang Vilas, which also has a separate exterior entrance, was the most visited space within the palace with murals which Kipling found fascinating, but which are common throughout Rajasthan. Rang Vilas was probably the Rao Rajas’ private apartment.

The Chattar Mahal:

Portraits of Rao Raja Ummed Singh are also seen on in another major complex within Bundi Palace, Chattar Mahal. This huge Mahal was built by Rao Chattarsal, [1631-1658] in S.1701 (1644 CE), a Rao killed fighting for Shah Jahan. A beautifully decorated inlaid ivory door leads you into a darkened room containing locally fashioned gilt and silver four-legged beds and portraits of the dead nobility of Bundi. The door in the Chattar Mahal remains, but the furniture and portraits (framed photographs) have apparently been taken away in the recent past.



How to get there:

By Air : Nearest airport is Jaipur.

By Bus: Bundi is approachable by road from Kota (35 km), Jaipur(210)    and  many other cities.

By Train: Train links from Kota, Agra and many other cities.

Getting around: Cycle - rickshaw and tongas are available.

Map: Courtesy Google.com

CAT III LANDING ON THE MIRAGE 2000

PRELUDE

Charles Svoboda's Story of 1965

This is a true story narrated by a copilot about professionalism and I have used it to set up the base for my story about flying in zero-zero weather.

It happened sometime in 1965, in Germany. I was a copilot, so I knew, everything there was to know about flying, and I was frustrated by pilots like my aircraft commander. He was one of those by-the-numbers types, no class, no imagination, no “feel” for flying.

You have to be able to feel an airplane. So what if your altitude is a little off, or if the glideslope indicator is off a hair? If it feels okay then it is okay. That’s what I believed. Every time he let me make an approach, even in VFR conditions, he demanded perfection.

Not the slightest deviation was permitted. “If you can’t do it when there is no pressure, you surely can’t do it when the pucker factor increases,” he would say. When he shot an approach, it was as if all the instruments were frozen – perfection, but no class.

Then came that routine flight from the Azores to Germany on our C-124 Globemaster. The weather was okay; halfway to the European mainland, the weather started getting bad. I kept getting updates by HF radio. Our destination, a fighter base, went zero/zero. Our two alternates followed shortly thereafter. All of France was down. We held for two hours, and the weather got worse. Somewhere I heard a fighter pilot declare an emergency because of minimum fuel. He shot two approaches and saw nothing. On the third try, he flamed out and had to eject.

We made a precision radar approach; there was nothing but fuzzy fog at minimums. I started to sweat a little. I turned on the instrument lights. When I looked out to where the wings should be, I couldn’t even see the navigation lights 85 feet from my eyes. I could barely make out a dull glow from the exhaust stacks of the closest engine, and then only on climb power. When we reduced power to maximum endurance, that friendly glow faded. The pilot asked the engineer where we stood on fuel. The reply was, “I don’t know… we’re so low that the book says the gauges are unreliable below this point.” We didn’t carry parachutes, so we couldn’t follow the fighter pilot’s example. We would land or crash with the airplane.

The pilot then asked me which of the two nearby fighter bases had the widest runway. I looked it up and we declared an emergency as we headed for that field. The pilot then began his briefing.

“This will be for real. No missed approach. We’ll make an ILS and get precision radar to keep us honest. Copilot, we’ll use half flaps. That’ll put the approach speed a little higher, but the pitch angle will be almost level, requiring less attitude change in the flare.”

Why hadn’t I thought of that? Where was my “feel” and “class” now?

The briefing continued, “I’ll lock on the gauges. You get ready to take over and complete the landing if you see the runway – that way there will be less room for trouble with me trying to transition from instruments to visual with only a second or two before touchdown.” Hey, he’s even going to take advantage of his copilot, I thought. He’s not so stupid, after all.

“Until we get the runway, you call off every 100 feet above touchdown; until we get down to 100 feet, use the pressure altimeter. Then switch to the radar altimeter for the last 100 feet, and call off every 25 feet. Keep me honest on the airspeed, also. Engineer, when we touch down, I’ll cut the mixtures with the master control lever, and you cut all of the mags. Are there any questions? Let’s go!” All of a sudden, this unfeeling, by the numbers robot was making a lot of sense. Maybe he really was a pilot and maybe I had something more to learn about flying.

We made a short procedure turn to save gas. Radar helped us to get to the outer marker. Half a mile away, we performed the Before Landing Checklist; gear down, flaps 20 degrees. The course deviation indicator was locked in the middle, with the glideslope indicator beginning its trip down from the top of the case. When the GSI centered, the pilot called for a small power reduction, lowered the nose slightly, and all of the instruments, except the altimeter, froze. My Lord, that man had a feel for that airplane! He thought something, and the airplane, all 135,000 pounds of it, did what he thought.

“Five hundred feet,” I called out, “400 feet……..300 feet…….200 feet, MATS minimums….. …….100 feet, Air Force minimums; I’m switching to the radar altimeter ……..75 feet nothing in sight……50 feet, still nothing….25 feet, airspeed 100 knots,”

The nose of the aircraft rotated just a couple of degrees, and the airspeed started down. The pilot then casually said, “Hang on, we’re landing.”

“Airspeed 90 knots….10 feet, here we go!”

The pilot reached up and cut the mixtures with the master control lever, without taking his eyes off the instruments. He told the engineer to cut all the mags to reduce the chance of fire. CONTACT! I could barely feel it. As smooth a landing as I have ever known, and I couldn’t even tell if we were on the runway, because we could only see the occasional blur of a light streaking by.

“Copilot, verify hydraulic boost is on, I’ll need it for brakes and steering.” I complied.

“Hydraulic boost pump is on, pressure is up.” The brakes came on slowly---we didn’t want to skid this big beast now. I looked over at the pilot. He was still on the instruments, steering to keep the course deviation indicator in the center, and that is exactly where it stayed.

“Airspeed, 50 knots.” We might make it yet.

“Airspeed, 25 knots.” We’ll make it if we don’t run off a cliff. Then I heard a strange sound. I could hear the whir of the gyros, the buzz of the inverters, and a low frequency thumping. Nothing else. The thumping was my pulse, and I couldn’t hear anyone breathing. We had made it! We were standing still!

The aircraft commander was still all pilot. “After-landing checklist, get all those motors, radar and unnecessary radios off while we still have batteries. Copilot, tell them that we have arrived, to send a follow me truck out to the runway because we can’t even see the edges.”

I left the VHF on and thanked GCA for the approach. The guys in the tower didn’t believe we were there. They had walked outside and couldn’t hear or see anything. We assured them that we were there, somewhere on the localiser centreline, with about half a mile showing on the DME.

Then I remembered the story from Fate Is the Hunter.  When Gann was an airline copilot making a simple night range approach, his captain kept lighting matches in front of his eyes. It scarred and infuriated Gann. When they landed, the captain said that Gann was ready to upgrade to captain. If he could handle a night-range approach with all of that harassment, then he could handle anything.

At last I understood what true professionalism is.

Being a pilot isn’t all seat-of-the-pants flying and glory.

It’s self-discipline, practice, study, analysis and preparation. It’s precision.

If you can’t keep the gauges where you want them with everything free and easy, how can you keep them there when everything goes wrong?

PART II

Over 90% of today's tourists travel by air. Its so much faster that the time saved more than compensates for the extra cost. In truth, even that statement is not really true in today's modern conditions. The advent of no-frills low-fare airlines have made the cost of flying cheaper than by rail, road or sea.

That said, travelling by air has its own limitations. These are mostly weather related and, in the odd case, aircraft availability. Sometimes, it is a combination of the two, when your specific aircraft gets held up ay another airport because it has a snag that needs attention, or the prevailing weather does not permit flight.

Automation will soon make flying possible in what we pilots call zero/zero conditions. An official definition of zero/zero exists: "atmospheric conditions that reduce cloud ceiling and visibility to zero." Current Instrument Landing Systems-ILS- have become so advanced that today's airliners require a Runway visual range (RVR) of 46 metres. The ILS transmits two beams, the Localiser (LOC) along the runway centre line and the Glidepath, along the aircraft's descent path. Both are displayed on one instrument, and the pilot has only to keep them centred to come down safely.

Runway visual range (RVR), in aviation terms, is the distance over which a pilot of an aircraft on the centreline of the runway can see the runway surface markings delineating the runway or identifying its centre line. RVR is normally expressed in metres. In the US, which has to be different, it is expressed in feet. RVR is used as one of the main criteria for minima on instrument approaches.

Category III is subdivided into three sections:

Category III A – A precision instrument approach and landing with:

a) a decision height lower than 100 feet (30 m) above touchdown zone elevation, or no decision height (alert height); and

b) a runway visual range not less than 200 meters (660 ft).

Category III B – A precision instrument approach and landing with:

a) a decision height lower than 50 feet (15 m) above touchdown zone elevation, or no decision height (alert height); and

b) a runway visual range less than 200 meters (660 ft) but not less than 75 meters (246 ft). Autopilot is used until taxi-speed. In the United States, FAA criteria for CAT III B runway visual range allows readings as low as 150 ft (46 m).

Category III C – A precision instrument approach and landing with no decision height and no runway visual range limitations. This category is not yet in operation anywhere in the world, as it requires guidance to taxi in zero visibility as well. "Category III C" is not mentioned in EU-OPS. Category III B is currently the best available system.

The main reason for the delay in using Cat IIIC ILS is its prohibitive cost. It might be required for only 6-8 days in a year! So why spend so much?  

Autolanding                

The Airbus 380 and Boeing 777/787 passenger airliners and the Dassault Rafale fighter jet have zero/zero capability as well as an autolanding system. An auto landing process is achieved by an autopilot together with the ILS. As the name suggests, the ILS directs where the plane goes and the autopilot ensures that it does so. The auto landing procedure is executed automatically but the Captain may still have to intervene to check that the speed is as desired when the flaps are selected from 0 degrees to landing position. 

At 50 feet, the autopilot flares the airplane, a term to describe how it would raise the nose slightly to prepare for a soft landing. The computer would call out aurally the heights every 10 feet and then at around 25 feet, the throttles are closed. At this point, the airplane should sit onto the runway gently and roll along the centreline until it comes to a complete stop by the auto brakes with the pilot aiding it further with reverse thrust. If the Captain is unable to see the taxiway because the visibility has further reduced, he may request a ‘Follow Me’ vehicle to guide the pilot to its parking bay. 

THE FINAL BIT

The first landing of the Mirage 2000 on the Gwalior-Agra highway

THE FINAL BIT

My story is about the Mirage 2000 fighter aircraft and flying in the early1990s. My Base Commander was a pedagogue who would not look outside the Rule Book. I was the Air Force Examiner on the Mirage 2000 aircraft and had devised holding patterns, one-in-ten approaches, ILS stacks, etc., things never heard by fighter pilots before. The book said I could fly in RVR of 1000 metres. One day, it so happened that my Base Commander's de jure boss at Command HQ, the Senior Air Staff Officer (SASO), an Air Marshal, had come down to visit the base and see how we conducted bad weather operations. 

It was drizzling that morning and the weatherman said that we could soon expect zero/zero conditions. The Base Commander shrugged his shoulders and looked rather apologetically at the SASO. SASO looked at me and said, " Air Force Examiner.. ........ ....Chicken?" I replied in a twang with a hint of an accusation, " Its your published order, sir. Override it and we could go." "Done," he said.

For those who don't know, the Mirage 2000 is the easiest aircraft in the world to fly, but bloody demanding to operate in war, given its multiple capabilities. The Indian Air Force took cognisance of this fact and split the force into squadrons with specific roles. The best aid available on board was the autopilot which could do anything, well, almost. In fact, the very same autopilot is fitted on the Airbus 319 / 320s. I had devised and tested an autolanding system, which I practised in a two-seater by night from the rear seat. Landings from the rear seat at night were not easy-you needed practice to get the hang of it. This was a drawback in the aircraft, in that the rear cockpit had a camera screen that repeated what the front-seat pilot could see through the Head Up Display (HUD) in the front cockpit by filming the HUD. The camera display was far too bright to see anything at all and had to be switched off. You had to approach the runway by looking through the side panels and aligning yourself with the edge of the runway. When about 50 feet above ground, you could see the runway lights, so getting back to the centre-line was easy. I would intentionally fly head down approaches at night, asking the front seat pilot to take over controls if my approach seemed hairy.

 

CAS Air Chief Marshal PK Mehra felicitating me on crossing 1000 hours on type

The Mirage 2000 is a tailless delta-wing aircraft and faced a problem common to all delta-wing aircraft; the nose of the aircraft had to be raised fairly high to generate the lift required to come in to land at reasonably low speeds. In fact, the Concorde also had this problem, solved ingeniously by deliberately drooping the nose so that the pilot could see what was ahead. In the Mirage 2000, you had to raise your seat fully and change the display on the HUD to what is called the approach mode, which had a landing-oriented but totally different set of symbols on display. Landing after these two actions then became as easy as in the daytime. Rain was a problem, because, even in a drizzle, forward visibility reduced to zero!

 

Base Cdr congratulating me on completing 1000 hours on the Mirage 2000

I got the SASO kitted up and into the rear seat quickly enough. As we taxied out, the fog came in and visibility reduced to 30 metres. I handed over controls to the SASO and asked him to taxy out. He coped well, because the taxy-tracks were 30 metres wide and he could see the centreline and the grass beyond the taxytrack edges. As we moved further away, visibility dropped to 10 metres and I had to take over controls again. ATC piped in with a warning that RVR was 20 metres and dropping. Without informing the SASO, I switched the ILS on and used the localiser to get onto the runway centreline. I asked the SASO if he would like to take off. He declined, saying,"I can't see anything." I insisted he take off, saying that the aircraft was on the centreline and would stay there for the 450 metres required for take off. In any case, I was there to assist or take over if anything went awry. He agreed and the take off was uneventful. 

We climbed out of all clouding by 9,000 feet. SASO started to throw the aircraft around, enjoying himself. Later, I took him down to 1,000 feet above ground level in a flattish and safe sector and, whilst still in cloud, showed him the ground mapping and safety modes of the multimode radar. I showed him how to distinguish roads from rail tracks, how to assess heights of hill features, what rivers and bridges looked like, danger warnings, etc. He was more than impressed with the quality of the display and what all could be achieved. Soon it was time to get back. I took over controls and said, "See for yourself how this aircraft autolands, sir,"  adding sotto voce that it was time to have a relook at orders issued at higher levels of command and control without really knowing what was actually possible in the field.

I got in touch with our local radar and informed him we were doing an auto-ILS and requested back up. I started to slow the aircraft down from 450 to 200 knots, punched the required buttons, raised my seat, selected auto-ILS and changed the HUD to the landing mode. I then showed SASO my hands and said, "I won't touch controls unless required."The aircraft autonavigated to the holding point and as my speed dropped below 225 knots, the "lower undercarriage" command prompted me to lower the landing gear. The aircraft had climbed to the stack safety height of 2,600 feet above sea level by then and entered the holding pattern at 200 knots. Since we were the only aircraft in the air, we exited the stack on our first turnaround.

I informed ground radar of our exit, lowered the landing gear and, as we approached the ILS LOC beam, the aircraft turned and captured the localiser. As mandated, I called out LOC capture. I then reduced power to hit approach angle of attack(ά) of 13° and maintained it. Soon we were on glidepath and the aircraft automatically commenced descent. Radar called out,"You're on glidepath and centreline. RVR is now zero in light drizzle. Wind is calm. Recheck wheels down and locked. Acknowledge." The Mirage 2000 has a beep signal that is transmitted on three frequencies at one time, when a button is pressed, but only if the wheels are down and locked. This signal confirms to the ground controllers that the wheels are actually down and locked. Radar, in turn, acknowledged the signal and we were now on ATC frequency on our second radio set. All this while we were in cloud. ATC called us and said that all runway lights and the AVASI (Abridged Visual Slope Indicator) were on. We would never see them. I then put the aircraft's 2000 watt landing lights on.

I had selected Radio-altimeter visual warning to 20 feet. As the aircraft silently descended through clouds, radar kept telling us,"On glide, on centreline." My hands were visible to SASO, who said,"Can't see a sausage outside." "Look at the Head Down Display, sir," I added. It showed our height, speed and glideslope. At 350 feet on radalt, I disconnected ILS glideslope, its minima being 300 feet-not even a Cat I ILS. I kept the last used glidepath on the autopilot and retained auto-centreline control. We were aligned perfectly down the centreline. At 100 feet, radar said, "Approaching our minima, on advisory if requested." I responded, "Yes, please."

He continued,"On centreline, crossing threshold, height should be 30 feet." It was. As the radalt warning came at 20 feet, I throttled back to idle and allowed the aircraft to sink, allowing the ά to increase to 14°. Close to the ground, at 15 feet and less, the air compressed under the large delta wings of the Mirage 2000 tends to cushion its landing. Radar said, "Approaching touchdown." As we touched down smoothly, the autopilot disconnected by default. I just stayed on the ILS line and asked SASO,"Shall we do another one, sir?" He declined. I gently brought the aircraft to a halt and asked for the follow me jeep. My engine noise and flashing lights were picked up by the follow me jeep, and I kept my landing lights on. This was reflected by the orange stripes of the jeep and we followed him all the way home at a sedate 10 kph. On the long stretch back, SASO waxed eloquent, totally impressed with the aircraft (and the Indian Air Force Examiner?)

Post first published June 2013

Saturday 9 September 2023

VIOLENCE IN MANIPUR

 Manipur Violence Deepens HINDU CHRISTIAN Distrust

Manipur's ethnic tensions have escalated as Meiteis push for "scheduled tribe" status. Amid violent clashes, the Kuki     community has demanded a separate administration.

Lawmakers in Manipur, a northeastern state in India rocked in recent months by ethnic violence, got together for a session specialé of the state council on 08 September 2023.

The hour long meeting saw the eruption of a war of words between ruling party and opposition lawmakers over the tense and unpredictable situation in the state. The Speaker was forced to call for and recess the session indefinitely.

The brief session was slammed by the opposition Congress party, calling it a mockery of an accepted republic state, thereby weakening the Constitution.

What is The Situation In The State?

Armed clashes between two of Manipur's three major ethnic groups, the substantially Hindu Meiteis and largely Christian Kukis, first broke out in May.

The state has since fractured along ethnic lines, and at least a hundred and fifty people have been killed in the violence and thousands displaced. Rival regulars have set up leaguers in some areas to keep members of the opposing community out.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi's civil government has stationed thousands of fresh Paramilitary troops from other states to patrol municipalities and roadways. Authorities have also assessed imposition of a curfew and an internet block.

Rights groups have indicted the state government, led by Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party( BJP), of not doing enough to stop the violence. They also purport that the BJP's programs promoting    " Hindu majoritarianism" have contributed to the problem.

Kukis Call For A Separate Administration

Some Kuki members, including lawmakers from the community, are now calling for the creation of a" separate administration" for the sections where they are in a maturity.

The physical population of the Kukis has been transferred to the hills and they no longer have any connection with the Imphal valley people, the Kuki’s claim. Under such circumstances, they feel compelled to ask for a separate administration under the guidance of the Central Government.

The 10 Kuki lawmakers in the 60- member assembly, including seven from the ruling BJP, refused to attend the assembly session on Tuesday. They had before blazoned their decision to skip the session, saying the "Imphal Valley has come a vale of death and destruction for the Kuki people." Imphal, the state capital, is dominated by the Meitei people.

Senior Kuki MLAs from the BJP ask how they could attend the session in the prevailing situation. Who would ensure their security when they travelled to Imphal? They cited the illustration of Vungzagin Valte, a BJP son and former ethnic affairs minister who was severely assaulted by a mob in Imphal in May.

What Sparked The Violence?

The fighting erupted due to dissensions over access to educational, employment and other profitable benefits. The disagreement stems from enmity between Manipur’s Meitei maturity and the Kuki- Zo, one of several ethnic groups in the state that make up about 16 per cent of its population.

The Meitei community is generally Hindu and largely lives in capital Imphal and the prosperous vale around it, while the substantially Christian Kuki- Zo generally live in scattered segments in the state’s hills. The Meitei, which accounts for over 50 of the state's 3.5 million residents, has demanded that it be recognised as a "Scheduled Tribe."

Longstanding tensions between the two communities have revolved around competition for land and public jobs, with rights activists accusing local leaders of exacerbating ethnic divisions for political gain. Things came to a head in May over plans to recognise the Meitei as a Scheduled Tribe (ST) – a status already conferred upon the Kuki. The ST status would grant Meiteis a form of affirmative action through guaranteed quotas of government jobs and college admissions.

Kuki-Zo groups staged protests over fears the plans could reduce their entitlements, with rallies quickly spiralling into violence.

The constitutionally defined status a "Scheduled Tribe” is a form of affirmative action intended to combat historical structural inequality and discrimination.

India reserves some government jobs, college places and elected seats for those categorized as "scheduled tribes." While the Meitei want the status, others like the Naga and the Kuki tribes have opposed this classification.

The latter two tribes account for around 40% of the state's population, and currently enjoy the scheduled tribe status, which gives them land-owning rights in the hills and forests that cover around 75% of Manipur.

The state's High Court asked the government to consider the Meitei's demand and set a deadline of mid-May. In response, the Naga and the Kuki tribes launched a protest against the possible extension of their benefits to the Meitei, who they believe are already the dominant community in the state. They argue that granting the Meitei more privileges would be unfair.

Amid the sharp ethnic tensions, Paotinthang Lupheng, president of the All-Tribal Students Union Manipur, stressed the need for the government to come up with a comprehensive strategy to tackle the deepening distrust between the two communities.

Clashes have killed at least 150 people, though many in Manipur believe the number could be higher. Some 60,000 people have been forced to flee their homes, taking shelter in relief centres or nearby states. Reprisal attacks have seen the firebombing of homes and places of worship. More than 220 churches and 17 Hindu temples had been destroyed by the end of July, according to a report by the India Today news magazine.

The violence will worsen if the government is unable to come up with a holistic policy framework that would engage all groups, and not just the Meitei majority.

Thursday 7 September 2023

CLOSE-IN AIR COMBAT

BASIC MISSILE DYNAMICS: PART 1


Gp Capt Noel Moitra VM

Presentation on Air Combat Tactics

Gwalior, India

1. This is a simple presentation on Missile Dynamics and how any given Missile Envelope is deduced, first published in 2005. The topic in itself is quite complex, so I will limit it to basic airman language. Depending on the feedback to this post on the Close Combat Missile (CCM), I might add posts on the Medium & Long Distance Beyond Visual Range Missiles. starting with the former.

Close Combat Missiles (CCM)


MATRA R550 Magic 1 AAM
 2. Prelude

The CCM began its operational journey in the Vietnam War. The initial CCMs came in 1956 when US aircraft began equipping with AIM-4 Falcon, AIM-7 Sparrow, and AIM-9 Sidewinder. The Soviets introduced the K-5 missile in 1957. Ever since, CCMs have improved in both agility and range.

They also saw significant use in the Arab-Israeli wars and the Iran-Iraq war. A Pakistan Air Force Atlantique was shot down by an IAF MiG-21 in 1999 and, in Feb 2019, a PAF F-16 was shot down by an Indian MiG-21 Bison during air combat in response to the Balakot strike.

CCMs are typically powered by rocket motors, usually using solid fuel. Ramjet engines (used in Meteor missiles), are now becoming popular, as they allow for maintaining higher average speed across their engagement envelope. CCM “dog-fight” within visual range weapons have shorter ranges of below 16 kilometers and are designed for agility rather than range. Most use infrared guidance. More modern infrared-guided missiles can detect the heat of an aircraft’s skin, warmed by airflow friction, in addition to the fainter heat signature of the engine when the aircraft is seen from the side/head-on. Combined with excellent maneuverability, this gives them an all-aspect capability. The pilot can also use a helmet-mounted sight (HMS) to slew the missile seeker’s head towards the target for an off-boresight launch. Medium and long-range missiles are beyond visual range (BVR) AAMs. These use active or semi-active radar guidance, sometimes combined with inertial guidance. Passive anti-radiation homing missiles could be used against AEW&C aircraft. Most missiles have a conventional explosive blast, fragmentation, or continuous rod warheads that detonate on impact or through a proximity fuse.  
I will first look at CCMs. Certain factors will be retained as constant, ie, Altitude, Velocity, Density, etc. For a given set of parameters, a specific missile has certain aspects that we need to understand:

       a) 1 'G' Flight Range. (G=Force due to Gravity, 9.81m/sec²)

       b) Off Bore-sight Ranges and energy-losing manoeuvres.

       c) Guidance systems.

3. 1'G' Flight Range. The 1'G' Flight Range of a missile is a function of its thrust and acceleration, aerodynamic profile, the lowest speed at which its control surfaces are effective and its self-destruct time. A missile when launched will travel a fixed range. Let us call it 'X ' Km. The missile becomes ineffective some time before reaching 'X' Km as its velocity drops to a value too low for its controls to remain effective. This could be called 'Y' Km. We have not considered the mother aircraft (ac) speed yet.  X is thus > Y, as drawn below.


4Introduction of other Factors. Range 'Y' is its effective max launch range. It will self-destruct some time later (X). The launch aircraft may or may not chase the missile which is chasing the Target. Assuming that the launch aircraft is chasing the missile, then, in the time taken to travel 'Y' Km, the mother aircraft also travels forward by a distance equal to its flight speed in m/sec x time taken by the missile to reach 'Y'. Add the launch aircraft speed to its own and missile range increases to 'Y'+ ac speed in mtr/sec x time of the effective flight of the missile, in metres. Range increases to a figure 'Z'. 


5.   The target is moving away at its own speed. The missile has to chase and hit it before becoming ineffective. The max away travel is = target speed @ mtr/sec x the effective time of flight of the missile from its position at time of launch. This is where overtake speed comes into the picture. The target travel away can be termed 'A' mtr or Km as the case may be, as shown: 


The true launch range becomes B= Z-A , valid only if the missile is launched from the line astern zone.  
6.     Summary:
     X =  Max missile travel range before self destruct
     Y =  Max self travel range of missile before loss of effective control         
     Z =  Max effective travel range after launch from the mother ac
     A =  Tgt travel away, reducing missile effective range.
     B =  Actual missile range as fed into basic computations for final result.
 
MATRA R550 Magic 2
                                                                                                  
7.    The Beam Attack.
When approaching the target from abeam, the launch range will be 'Z' Km. Since we are dealing in secs, the lateral travel of the tgt ac may be considered as minimal, both in metres and geometric degrees. While it is not as simple as it may seem , it will suffice for the nonce. If coming in from dead head-on, the range will be maximum, a function of the closure rate of the two ac, not the overtake. It is assumed that the missile under consideration has the thermal ability to detect hot spots. Essentially , it should sense target skin friction thermal signature and the efflux heat, which disperses conically with its locus the exhaust pipe or jet nozzle. Smart missiles have the ability to focalise the efflux but need super-sensors to add the two as they are at differing thermal-band ranges  The simplest graphic design for an abeam launch is as shown below. With Z as the basic launch range, the beam attack will give you approx 1.8-2.0 B, with 3.5- 4.0 B as the head on launch range. Now we can progress to define the envelope of the CCM. It will be as shown below, in its simplest form : 


8. The missile has a finite range, as we saw. It depends entirely on its energy, which is a sum of its dynamic + static energy, ie, ac launch speed, its own speed as imparted by its thrusters, and altitude. If, for any reason the missile has to move sideways, it turns with an attendant energy loss. Energy is quantified as: MH + 1/2  MV², with M being its mass, H being height and 'V' its velocity. Any turn is an acceleration, and eats into its reserve of energy. Its Centripetal Force is = mass x accn written as (W)² / r  and Drag =1/2PV²S. These have to be added and taken out of its reserve, affecting it adversely by reducing range. Under the best conditions, frictional drag at release from the launcher is kept at its lowest, by using Teflon interfaces and Titanium rails.
9.  As an aside, there are 2 types of release , viz.,  twin-vice  clamps and one-way rails. The former was used in the earlier days as it was very simple and effective. At launch, the clamps just opened up and the missile fell off as its fuel lit up. In about 01 sec, the missile would have reached around 0.8 M. But it would have dropped 05 m and lose another 15 m in the next sec. Remember S=1/2 gt², S being Gravity drop.  This was unsuitable for low flying ac. In the rails system, the missile starts to tip nose down as its C of G moves out, ahead of the rails. The outcome is an undesirable Twisting Moment, a Math.term. The solution lay with ultra-high boost at T=0, easy as the exhaust piping was part of its body. Once boosted to its max capable velocity, thrust reduces smoothly in the initial coast phase to zero. The missile is designed to climb at some optimum angle for a specific time to counter the loss in ht and controlled by a/c Wpn Cmptrs. Latest generation ac use solid fuel rear-section  tubing that burn from out to in and rear to front, but only at extremely high temps.This is created by the very last 5% of the fuel. The K-13 Missile had a fixed degree of climb at 3.5º till supersonic (1.0-1.02'), explaining how its exhaust gases entered the ac intake or interfered with the incoming airflow, resulting in a flame-out. Most ex- MiG 21 jockeys will support this statement.
 
10. Role of Aspect Angle.  Now for the complicated part. What if you are not dead astern of the tgt  ac and at zero aspect as shown in the first few diagrams?  You can have an ac dead ahead but travelling across you as in Fig 3. Angle of sight = ZERO, angle of flight =90º. To reduce the complexity of calculations, let us break up the 90* segment into 90 segments of 01º each. Effectively, we are increasing aspect angle by 01º at a time. In Trigonometry, sin 0º [zero drgrees]=zero, and its value increases significantly only > sin 60º. Hence sin 0 tends to 1 as 0 tends to 90º. This can be stated mathematically as:
          1
R~  [sin 0(0->90º). 
          0
This isn't yet an equation, only a starting point. We have not yet included the fact that the rate of change of 0 becomes insignificant after the 60º point. This may be written as:
           1                        0.86
 R~   [sin 0(60-90º) + [sin 0(0-60º) . 
        .87                     0
Again, this is not complete as the acceleration factor is yet to be fed in. Any change in either direction or speed, the components of velocity, is actually an acceleration, which is scientifically defined as the rate of change of velocity, or a~v/ t . We will leave it as such for the moment.     
 
11.   Simplification.   We know that sin 30=1/2, sin 45=1/ √2 = 0.7, sin 60= .87 and that sin 90=1. Thus, progression can be seen as 1/2 from zero to 30º. Simpler still, accn based on angular change is 1/2 / 30 or 0.167 units per degree between zero and 30º. It is 0.225 units per degree between 30-45º, 0.45 units from 45 to 60º tapering sharply thereafter to a low 0.04 units per degree. This is reflected in launch ranges increasing by 'B' x 0.167 / degree up to 30º, then at 'B' x  0.225 upto 45º and finally  'B' x 0.02 by 90º. This will show up as a jerky jig, as the 30º range will jump to the 31º pt.
 
12. Integration. Now that we have more data, we can start to develop an equation, removing any jerky parameters. Thus we can introduce a simple equation, albeit slightly incorrect.
                    0 .17           0 .225
Thus, R= [ sin 0-30º [sin 30-45º and so on upto 90º. Such calculations
                    0                0 .17
will be transferred into drawing an envelope of launch range of a CCM. Herein lies the difficulty, as the missile will be required to turn to hit the target. Each turn costs energy and results in a drop in range. Let us introduce some other factors that constitute the algorithm that provides a launch envelope:
a) Radar accuracy.
b) Radar lock.
c) Missile lock and head capability.
d) Relative turn rates of the mother ac, target and missile as computed by the launch control computer and provided to the Display Systems, both audio and visual. 
e) Missile control systems in flight.
f) Missile explosion command system.
g) Latax.
h) Boresight angles.
i) Angle of Attack and high G.
j) SEP Curves.
k) Human Factors.
 
13.   Each factor has its own CEP. Assuming that each is 99%, the end result will be 99 x 99 ten or nine times. Practically, we work at 95% CEP. At 95% CEP, the SSKP will work out  to 0.60. At 99% , SSKP is as low as 72%. Salvo firing improves SSKP to 84%. 
 
             The Matra MICA multi-role AAM
14.  Drawing Firing Envelopes. Let us look at the earlier equation again. We had said that : 
      0.17        0.225
R= [ sin 0-30º [sin 30-45º and so on upto 90º. Taking an SSKP of 0.8  with  
      0.0          0.17
                                                                                               8   n     0.02
99% CEP, we can state that   R~ [ [ [ sin 0-90 < @ 01º> <g=k> < F =N ~t >, ie, at 1'G',
                                                                             0  1      0.0
with ‘n’=  no of multiplicands of the variables involved, power loss 'F'  at a fixed rate N, normal with respect to the time factor 't ' & 1G.  This will give us a 1G envelope at its simplest.  The one most important factor is lateral accn or Latax, as it controls both pitch angle and moment of force at launch. Angles beyond abeam are not yet under study in this article. But an actual beam launch has to consider the fact that the final impact will be close to the astern for heat seeking heads. The weapons computer calculates the lead angle required for a laterally moving target and modifies the algorithm controlling the firing envelope in question. Standard Deviation has been utilised but in a simplistic form. This is simple to understand. Alls well so far and I hope that somebody actually understands and then takes time off to teach the ignorant.
 
15.   In order to look beyond 1G, CAD Programmes and Std Deviation become mandatory. This is Greek and Latin to all of us, self included. Yet, it is necessary and will form the bulk of my next and concluding article on CCMs. We will see that time-tested formulae are no longer valid. As an example, the pro-turn component of thrust at high AOA is to be added and change the standard rules totally. Add to that thrust vector 3D swivel and the entire gamut of turn performance is overhauled. Add off-boresight launch and where do we reach ? We shall see.